Post

Review No Smoking – Injurious to Head

A good friend writes,

The movie was a treat for the senses. The background music, sound design, camerawork, special effects – all worked towards narrating the idea. Nope, I cannot make myself say I saw a story; it was a visual description of an idea – a ‘what if…?’ Such cinema might not be the proverbial “everyone’s cup of tea.

And she couldn’t be more correct. Anurag Kashyap’s hyped up most awaited release is definitely not everyone’s cup of tea – it’s actually not anyone’s cup of tea. Coming to think of it, it’s not even a cup of tea, coffee, Breezer or thanda. It’s in fact a stylish, empty but yet stinking ashtray.

Now don’t get me wrong here, if you have been reading this blog for long then you would surely know how tolerant I am of Indian cinema. Despite umpteen warnings, I still did watch (and in some cases even enjoyed) films like Meenaxi, Abhay, RVG Ki Aag, Being Cyrus and the likes. But No Smoking simply stands out – Yes, it’s a dark film. Yes, it treads on the European experimental lines. And yes, it’s a “hatke” film but the problem here is that it is so “hatke” that audience (if any left) ka dimaag satak jayega.

Yet, despite the pathetic reviews all across the media. Notwithstanding friends & family calling me a nut job, I went ahead with No Smoking, dragging two other innocent acquaintances along. However things did get a wee-bit scary when I realized that we were only 7 occupying a multiplex screen with a capacity of nearly 200 (even RVG Ki Aag had a better attendance record re). And to top it all up, the screen next door was running houseful – thanks to Mr. Imitaz Ali.

Anyway getting back to Desperately Need a Smoke No Smoking…

- Story and script wise, as my friend above mentioned – there isn’t any.

- Direction wise – well it’s difficult to imagine that this film is made by the same guy who brought us Black Friday. Agreed the two films are world apart, genre wise but for crying out loud they are also at two extremes; one an example of brilliance and the other shot-in-the-head. The thing is, I sincerely believe in a popular karmic gyaan, “what goes around comes around” – So Mr. Kashyap, if you go out of your way to be critical of others, others will only do the same with you. And no number of blog posts or explanations from your end will change that blunt reality.

- John Abraham – I have to say, he is the ONLY part of the film that doesn’t disappoint. Meaning, we know that this man can’t act and no film-maker, even someone as genius as Mr. Kashyap can’t make him act and true to these words – that’s what he exactly did in this film. He didn’t act.

- Ranvir Shorey and Paresh Rawal – completely wasted.

- Ayesha Takia – Someone please enroll her at the nearest gym.

The only saving grace (now don’t look so shocked)…

- Some portions are very well shot – example, Ranvir and John’s childhood flashback and the hazy spirit hovering around from time to time.

– Torture has a time-limit of only two hours.

- Sizzling Bipasha song, “Phook De”…sadly come only when the credits start rolling. I believe it’s an incentive to keep the audience glued to their seat because the film, itself miserably fails to do so.

I guess the only person truly happy with the outcome of No Smoking must be Ram Gopal Verma – yaar, finally a film even more crappier than his Sholay remake is out and that too conceptualized by his dearest protégé.

Final Words – No Smoking is kind-da bizarre demented film. And no matter how tolerant you are of such type of cinema, with most certainty this one will be difficult to digest. All I can say is that, if Anurag sir still is persistent on making such European DVD-rehashed experimental films than he is better off experimenting in Europe. Or at least be courteous enough to release such films with a statutory warning – “Only for Zombies”.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

Trackback Address »

[...] A prominent blogger in the Indian blah-go-sphere has this to say about No Smoking: “… yes, it’s a “hatke” film but the problem here is that it is so “hatke” that audience (if any left) ka dimaag satak jayega..” (No Smoking – Injurious to Head) [...]

Pingback by No Smoking - Review and more « A Fine Imbalance — November 26, 2007 at 5:35 pm | #

[...] “… yes, it’s a “hatke” film but the problem here is that it is so “hatke” that audience (if any left) ka dimaag satak jayega..” (No Smoking – Injurious to Head) [...]

Pingback by No Smoking - Reviews and More « Full2 Faltu — November 30, 2007 at 12:14 pm | #

[...] Saakshi Juneja, To Each Its Own Rating: Thumbs down …Ayesha Takia – Someone please enroll her at the nearest gym…. See full review [...]

Pingback by Review - No Smoking » without giving the movie away… — December 7, 2007 at 1:32 am | #

Comments

21 comments | Add your comment »

Anshul
Oct 30th, 2007 at 8:22 am | #

Thanks for saving my money by writing this review else i would have wasted some money on this movie :d

Naresh
Oct 30th, 2007 at 3:57 pm | #

I knew this was the place I had to read so as not to watch this mve! :D Heard pretty bad things abt the mve… this sums them all up! :P

Mitali
Oct 31st, 2007 at 5:25 am | #

I have always been an Anurag Kashyap fan, right from his Satya days and thought Black Friday was one of the most realistic films of the recent times. But am very dissapointed to say that No Smoking was utter rubbish. As a long time fan I feel cheated. Hopefully next time round he would make something worthwhile.

asuph
Oct 31st, 2007 at 6:03 am | #

so any tom dick and harry can criticize Kashyap, but if Kashyap criticizes Ramu, it’s a sacrilege, is it? it’s curious you still call your blog: to each his own. but then, it’s your blog. and if you want it to be sarcastic about its title, who is anyone to object?

PS: I have no opinion on Kashyap, or even Ramu’s latest films, as I’ve not watched any of them (nor anything by Kashyap). (Why this disclaimer? Because, history has taught me, that people tend to confuse defending a person’s right to do “xyz” with defending the person himself, and the discussion goes on a tangent)

Saakshi O. Juneja
Oct 31st, 2007 at 6:20 am | #

@ Asuph : Well not that I need to but let me explain a certain things here -

1. I am NOT critizing Mr. Kashyap but yes, I am critizing his film. I have a right to do so since I wasted spent Rs. 250 on a worthless effort. I am no critic, just someone who loves Bollywood and everything that comes along with it.

2. Its no wrong in critizing other film-makers and their efforts but one shouldn’t get personal, especially when you call “those” people your close associates (so I believe). Sadly, Mr. Kashyap tends to get personal (very evident from his posts), plus he didn’t even spare the ones whom he calls his mentors.

3. Obviously, I am (or others for that matter) nobody to dictate “norms” on civilized behavior but then if a person insists for ridiculing others then he/she should be brave enough to take some crap themselves. And so I said in the post as well, “what goes around, comes around”.

And if you still find sarcasm in my blog’s title….then that your prerogative; “To each its own”. ;)

asuph
Oct 31st, 2007 at 7:04 am | #

By criticism, I meant criticism of work/body-of-work. Of course you have a right. Anyone has a right to criticize anyone’s work. But for all that insistence on your right to criticize, when others criticize someone else’s work, you’re shocked.

> But what seriously shocked me, was his (recent) open criticism of his so-called mentor, Ram Gopal Varma.

What is this crap about “he didn’t even spare the ones whom he calls his mentors”. Mentors are not Gods. What’s wrong with criticizing mentors?

To each his own, really?

anonymous
Oct 31st, 2007 at 7:40 am | #

i havent seen the movie yet but so much of bad press and audience not being able to understand is making me curious and also the fact that its something like most of charlie kauffman movies especially the second half from what i heard if it is anything like that i hardly think it will make any business or be appreciated by most of indian public….

Saakshi O. Juneja
Oct 31st, 2007 at 9:04 am | #

@ Asuph – Chalo at least one is straight that we both are talking about criticism of one’s work and nothing else. And believe me; I have no issues when others are critical of someone else’s work or even my work for that matter.

I was shocked for the following reasons,

1. Having met Anurag in person and chatting with him for hours, I had formed a certain opinion of the man and his take on the Hindi cinema. However reading his interviews in past couple of months (along with his posts), the now picture appeared to be contradictory of the earlier opinion. The post you are referring to simply is an expression of the above line; if I can praise him and his opinions (in the related interview), I can surely express my disappointment.

2. Again referring to this post and the related comments – From personal point of view I would never diss someone I consider my own, especially not in public and definitely not in the hands of media. During my chat with Mr. Kashyap, he spoke very highly (and affectionately) of RVG and couple of months down, after the release of RVG Ki Aag, he was busy ridiculing the same man. Agreed, it’s no crime in expressing his discontent with the concerned film but I felt he went a little overboard by publically labeling the director demented. Criticizing is one thing and insulting someone is another.

In my opinion, no upright behaves in such way. Surely you wouldn’t do the same with your best friend or a family member, now would you?

But then again this is what I personally believe and yes, since this is my blog and since blogs are meant to be space for one’s personal expressions, I wrote the posts you are referring to.

asuph
Oct 31st, 2007 at 10:08 am | #

> From personal point of view I would never diss someone I consider my own, especially not in public and definitely not in the hands of media.

That’s you, fine. But how does that go with “to each his own” when you expect others to do the same? It becomes “to each my own”.

> During my chat with Mr. Kashyap, he spoke very highly (and affectionately) of RVG and couple of months down, after the release of RVG Ki Aag, he was busy ridiculing the same man.

Nowhere in the excerpts that you gave, or the interview I read, I see “ridiculing the man”. I see ridiculing his current work. Which, by your admission is OK, no? Or is it also “diss’ing”?

> Agreed, it’s no crime in expressing his discontent with the concerned film but I felt he went a little overboard by publically labeling the director demented. Criticizing is one thing and insulting someone is another.

Do you have a reference? (I tried to google but didn’t get it, so curious). Because the excerpts that you gave, did not hint at any “personal” insults.

> In my opinion, no upright behaves in such way. Surely you wouldn’t do the same with your best friend or a family member, now would you?

Criticize? Yes. Insult? No. But I don’t see why it should be different with “your own”, and “not your own” (surely it’s not OK to insult not your own, too?). It’s the same “she’s and indian, how can your criticize you” line all over again.

> But then again this is what I personally believe and yes, since this is my blog and since blogs are meant to be space for one’s personal expressions, I wrote the posts you are referring to.

Absolutely. But remember that your writing will be judged for its inconsistency (and it’s inconsistency with the tag line of the blog). You have the freedom, of course, to ask people not to comment on your blog, and remove comments.

Saakshi O. Juneja
Oct 31st, 2007 at 10:42 am | #

@ Asuph – Oh! How I would love to sit whole day replying to your hissing but frankly I actually don’t care much what you (or others) think of what I think of someone like Anurag – especially when one refuses to even make an attempt to understand the other person’ s point of view.

That’s you, fine. But how does that go with “to each his own” when you expect others to do the same? It becomes “to each my own”.

Well I certainly do not expect others to think on the same lines as me and I think I am quite tolerant of what others have to say in response to my thoughts – perfect example of which is our comment-to-comment conversation. And so I don’t see any inconsistency in my writings when compared to my blog’s title. But if someone else thinks so than that’s their choice.

You know, the best thing that I have learnt from my blogging experience is having a “thick skinned” attitude towards your detractors – just felt like sharing this with you.

Anyway, this would be my last reply to your comment on this post because I rather spend this energy on doing another film review. So take care till we tussle next time. ;)

asuph
Oct 31st, 2007 at 11:04 am | #

> Oh! How I would love to sit whole day replying to your hissing

HA! So typical of tolerance: anyone says anything that you don’t agree with, it becomes dissing, hissing and what not.

And typical example of what’s horribly wrong with Indian Blogosphere: no substantiation, refusal to back up with facts, not answering pointed questions, flaunting “I don’t care what you think about” when one has been left with nothing to say (but, curiously not before), inability to hold a focussed, to the point, discussion …

> And so I don’t see any inconsistency in my writings when compared to my blog’s title.

I thought you wouldn’t. Because you’re one of “your own”. And you wouldn’t like to be objective about “one of your own”, would you?

> You know, the best thing that I have learnt from my blogging experience is having a “thick skinned” attitude towards your detractors – just felt like sharing this with you.

Thanks. But you’re really kidding yourself. It’s obvious from your responses, how thick your skin is. BTW, the dictionary meaning of detractor is: “one who disparages or belittles the worth of something”. I’m not belittling “your worth”. I’m showing inconsistencies in your written thoughts. That’s the tradition of healthy debate that’s alien to you.

But I’ve beginning to wonder if it’s a thick skin or just simple closed mind?

> Anyway, this would be my last reply to your comment on this post because I rather spend this energy on doing another film review. So take care till we tussle next time.

For what? Another hit and run? Thanks but not thanks. I’ve had enough of “hissing”.

stay well,
asuph.

Saakshi O. Juneja
Oct 31st, 2007 at 11:08 am | #

And finally I see the lord smiling back at me. And now I shall go and it some chips. :)

Prasoon
Nov 2nd, 2007 at 4:23 am | #

Thanks to those souls who watched this flick on Saturday last and asked me NOT to go else I was all game..

Mali
Nov 3rd, 2007 at 6:06 pm | #

sombody plz sue that Anurag for making such a sardard film. i want my money back.

spooky
Nov 5th, 2007 at 5:53 am | #

You’re a dope. Don’t “review” stuff you don’t understand. Go watch some real movies before trying to review this one.

lol
Nov 5th, 2007 at 1:10 pm | #

i watched this movie yeaterday. It was really different…no one in India has made such time of movie…but the problem is i did not understand the movie…but still i enjoyed. i dont know what i enjoyed may be the different experience.

Deepthi
Nov 16th, 2007 at 4:08 pm | #

SAkshi..

Agreed ‘No Smoking’ did not live up to the hype and failed to deliver..But,its too unfair on your part to write off John Abraham..Though there had been a lot of unimpressive perfomances from his side,i feel he is a director’s actor..He has always done a neat job in movies which Jism,Taxi 9211 and hold ur breath..No Smoking..CAnt belive you did failed to see that JOhn had a very good understanding of the character and did justice to it..

Saakshi O. Juneja
Nov 17th, 2007 at 6:02 am | #

Deepthi – Now that’s a John Abraham fan talking. ;)

Leave a comment

Comment Guidelines:
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

eIndia reserves the right to take down irrelevant and improper comments without any notice. Please use your common sense when posting comments.

Email addresses will never be published.

← Previous post
Friday Releases And Related Goss
Next post →
Happy Halloween

About

Sakshi Juneja

We all have a right to express our views. In many instances; it will be against ours and in some; with us. To hear them out is 'decency' but to let them get to you is 'weakness'. More info »

I also blog at DesiDabba and DesiCritics

Campaigns

There are a lot of things that are wrong in this world. If we do not raise our voices and try to bring justice to these issues at hand, we do ourselves and our society an injustice. Here are some campaingns that are on-going at To Each It's Own

More campaigns

Recently on TEIO

Recent comments

Movie Reviews

More movie reviews

somerights20

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License

hit counter