If rumors have even a little bit of the creditability factor in them, then it wouldn’t be wrong to state that more than half of our Hindi Film Industry is involved in what we call – “immoral actsâ€, going by the society norms. Be it extra-marital affairs, underworld connections, monetary cheating and last but not the least, the most controversial sin of all, “the casting couchâ€.
From the bottom most pit to the high-handed actresses, all have been linked to this tainted term; performing sexual favors for those who “matter†in the industry and in some cases, innocent souls turned into Bollywood prostitutes just so they could hear the famous words, “Lights, Camera and Actionâ€.
However for long there was this perceived notion that only women are subjected to the matters of casting couch and this could be in Bollywood, Fashion Industry or the Television Industry. But over the years, the number of cases concerning male casting couch have also been over-whelming.
The very recent one (which did manage to make to our daily-tabloids) being popular Bollywood singer Sonu Nigam accusing renowned Film Critic, Mr. Subash K. Jha of holding a personal vendetta against him just because he refused his sexual advances.
In his retaliation to Jha’s article “It’s a nosy affair†in Times of India, where the accused in many words hinted the singer to not whine over his nasal rival aka. Himesh Reshammiya’s mass-popularity, the not-so-happy Sonu Nigam decided to set the record straight.
Let me spill the beans open for you. I’ve kept quiet for too long just hoping that his conscience will overcome his vengeance for me.
It’s not a secret in the industry that he is a homosexual. God bless him for homosexuals are normal people with just different sexual preferences, just like men lusting for women is not a taboo. But a man punishing a woman for not complying with his sexual advancement is an issue right? So why isn’t a man imposing upon another man an issue? Isn’t this a free world?
Am I supposed to reciprocate to something that I am not interested in? And do I have to be subjected to this kind of DADAGIRI for no fault of mine?
He further goes on to state his justified reasons…
What is my fault in this? No one is obligated to interact with people who make one feel uncomfortable! And especially when someone would constantly talk either negative, or suggestive! I am not just an artiste but also a reader of your newspaper from the time I gained consciousness to this world. I demand you to treat me like a common man. I am not alone in this world; I have a close knit family, friends and admirers who feel deeply hurt when this kind of unaccountable bashing is inflicted upon me. I want to be left alone. I don’t want to be subjected to this strange kind of sexual assault where all that I did like a phenomenon some time back has become something so hateworthy for this sick man.
Now if you ask me, I think by outing Mr. Jha’s scheming tactics (if one goes by the letter’s every word) Sonu did the right thing. If the so-called film critics have the official license to rip apart anything and everything concerning the Film Industry, I believe everyone else, even those remotely involved have the very same rights to justify or defend their intentions (even if it means getting “personalâ€). Agreed, for many Sonu Nigam may appear to be jealous of His Himeshness’s stardom, be it as a singer or an actor. But tell me something wouldn’t you be pissed off as well on watching your competitor raking-in recognition, not out of talent but simply out of the mass absurdity – frankly speaking, I am and I am not even a bathroom singer.
A good friend, who doesn’t agree on Sonu’s approach, however raises a valid point.
For all their talk of “industry†and it’s ills, Jha – a journalist who’s only connected peripherally to said industry, with very limited power over the careers of upcoming actors/singers – remains the only one to be directly named. If we’re having an indepth examination of people in the film industry taking advantage of male newcomers, then why not start talking about people who actually make the movies? Producers, directors, financiers, actors, actresses…
Seriously one wonders if Sonu Nigam would have done the same had it been a popular director or a honcho from a powerful production house. But then again, this is Bollywood we are talking about – here friends become enemies in no time and enemies best friends even quicker; don’t you remember the Anu Malik and Alisha Chenia episode.
So who knows – tomorrow’s headlines may be read “Jha throws a Funsome Baby Shower for the Nigamsâ€.
UPDATE :
Here’s another shocker, Bobby Darling is being accused of molesting a 22 year-old male model Surjeet Jagdish Singh who won the title of Mr Jharkhand and Ranchi last year. Read about it, here.
On the some-what same note, me thinks who next – Shah Rukh Khan outing Karan Johar….(only joking yaar, chillax).







Comments
6 comments | Add your comment »
Bikram
Jul 18th, 2007 at 2:33 pm | #
Huh. These Filmy people have long been denying the existence of casting couch in the industry. Every other actress is saying “This industry is not as bad as it is portrayed to be”. Huh. “Page 3″ is what’s really happening there.
shadows
Jul 18th, 2007 at 5:27 pm | #
Sakshi..
You should have seen that episode of Koffee with Karan last week with oh-so-predictable boring “Saahrook”, shrieking Kajol and even more shrieking irritating Rani mukherjee.
Saahrook took a shot at Karan Johars supposedly gay credentials
Plus they hugged each other (I havent seen Karan hugged by any other actor so tightly as Saahrook did )
I dont remember exactly, but Saahrook said something like – “It would be really wrong if I woke up in Karan’s bed” or something like that
.. LOLzz…
bebe
Jul 19th, 2007 at 5:54 am | #
Was Jha really so powerless? True he wasn’t a involved in movie production but he certainly could influence the public perception about whomever he chose to bash or suck up to. His articles were everywhere. I never could understand why he was published so much since he seemed to have zero credibility – his bias was so obvious – he did seem to be the mouthpiece for the Bachchans and Aishwarya.
Ravindra
Jul 20th, 2007 at 5:47 am | #
I remember the infamous Preeti Jain- Madhur Bhandarkar case, where ppl started pooh-poohing Preeti’s claims and said that it was her decision to go along anyway blah blah…
Even during the India-TV sting operation on Shakti Kapoor, there were many who supported the actor.
In this case, I wonder who will get more support – the victim (Sonu) or the aggressor(Subhash)?
(In an unrelated case, the aggressor Salman Khan got loads of sympathy against the victim of 42 obscene phone calls Vivek Oberoi – this is how Bollywood functions, looks like)
shadows
Jul 20th, 2007 at 6:30 am | #
Ravindra..
good observation… thats something really lunatic about Bollywood..
Arunkumar
Aug 4th, 2007 at 7:23 am | #
I like him so much.