Post

Ram Jethmalani’s Bastardly Act

IBN Live Reports

“I will ask the judges to shut the courtroom because today verdicts are given within the confines of a TV studio,” Jethmalani said.

The former union law minister alleged the media has unleashed a malicious campaign against Sharma and doubts the integrity of the judges hearing the case. That allegation seem ironic as in a petition before the Delhi High Court, Jethmalani on Friday requested that the case be transferred from Sodhi’s court.

“The prosecution, police and the media can do what they want but Manu will be acquitted one thousand percent, but I don’t want people to say that we won the case because the judge was corrupt.”

Wow! When you read about people like Ram Jethmalani, you can’t help but gasp and agree, “Ya re, India is Shining”. It is surely shinning bright for people with power, people with money and people with connections - while the common man is continually made a chutiya by the system and the ones who control the system as if she were their pet-bitch.

Jessica Lall’s murder was shocking and painful just like Priyadarshini Mattoo rape and murder, just like Manjunathan’s brutal death and god only knows how many more that are today just part of India’s shinning statistics. But the corruption syndrome is so deeply rooted in our lives, in our system that it not only bends the prescribed law but so darn easily moulds it to one’s convenience and desired outcome. We cry out when certain laws are formed, others conveniently jump up and start blaming the laws and its procedures. But how can prescribed laws take course when the ones given to duty to carry it forward and implement it in a rightful manner; get busy abusing it and start taking it as some sort of a money-printing dhanda or odd publicity.

Jethmalani accuses the media of a malicious campaign against his client and then he confidently declares his client’s victory much before the proceedings have even begun. Such is his certainty; such is his belief in the justice system of our shining nation. Then again, why wouldn’t he? A man who practically spent most of his courtroom time buying freedom and time for criminals, a so-called intelligent man who so easily duped the law and order system, a strong personality who traded his ’serving the truth’ oath for his political aspirations - obviously if there is any hope for Manu Sharma then Mr. Jethmalani is his man.

Agree the Indian media isn’t always on the right path and can be very manipulative at times. But if the judges, lawyers and others involved in the
Law enforcing and maintaining process had done their job in the first place then this day wouldn’t have arrived. Plus to say that the media is passing a verdict would be entirely incorrect - we the people are also part of it. If we the people hadn’t shown the interest or the inclination towards attaining justice then it would have just been a one off story for the media. All they have done is pass people’s opinions to other citizens of the country.

And we shall see tomorrow when same Jethmalani would be running behind the same media and the citizens of this nation to fill his voting bank.

Some may call my detestation towards Mr. Jethmalani influenced by my hatred for Manu Sharma and this may be true; after all isn’t a man better known from the choices he makes. Mr. Jethmalani’s illustrious (criminal) client list is enough to form an opinion. However the point here is that we a not talking about a regular lawyer but a senior most lawyer who was once a law minister of our country. What sort of a standard is he setting by siding a criminal? And that too not the first time.

One can’t help but question his intentions, after all Jessica Lall case has been going on for the past many years then what lead to his interest init only now?
And if he is really a care-taker of the Indian Justice System then how come he never offered his (continue) his service to the Lalls or the Mattoos. Oh! I forgot they are not well-connected or wealthy and definitely in no way would enhance Jethmalani’s political career. And what about work ethics? He apparently did consult the Lalls during the first trial, so morally speaking is he correct to side with the opposition now.

Mr. Jethmalani insists that every accused deserves a fair trial and to ensure that Manu Sharma gets one too, he has now decided to fight the battle for him. Mr. Jethmalani is absolutely correct, Manu Sharma does deserve a fair trial, so what if in his previous trial (of the same case) circumstantial evidence were mysteriously mis-handled and the main witnesses suddenly turned hostile.

To cut the crap short, the question we need to ask here is that should people like Ram Jethmalani be allowed to contest elections, practice law and be part of the law-making system? Especially when everything else indicates his actual purpose to be greed for fame, power and money, suitably disguised as “right to a fair trial”.

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

Trackback Address »

[...] Sakshi O.Juneja, it appears, is displeased with Ram Jethmalani. Posted by kuffir [...]

Pingback by Blogbharti » ^&$#& Jethmalani — November 10, 2006 at 3:35 pm | #

[...] Sakshi O.Juneja, it appears, is displeased with Ram Jethmalani. Posted by kuffir [...]

Pingback by Blogbharti » Blog Archive » ^&$#& Jethmalani — November 12, 2006 at 7:23 pm | #

Comments

20 comments | Add your comment »

Patrix
Nov 5th, 2006 at 10:17 pm | #

Sakshi, I beg to differ. Right to a legal counsel and to argue one’s case is one of the primary traits of a democratic state. We might have already convicted Manu of being guilty in Jessica Lal’s murder but that doesn’t stop him from having a fair trial.

Do you have a problem with someone defending him or is your problem restricted to Jethmalani defending him? If it is the latter, then I must add that it is Jethmalani’s professional choice. If his client is proven guilty, it will affect him professionally. And after all, someone must defend Manu in the court of law, right? If we believe in justice and Manu is guilty, then no lawyer can save his ass.

Vikas
Nov 6th, 2006 at 1:19 am | #

Sakshi:

Is it hard to see that Jethmalani is using the media itself to pressurise the judges? Mark my words, we and the media, by keeping the spotlight on him and the Jessica Lall case, will be helping him. The more the media keeps the Jessica Lall case as a top news, the worse it’s gona get for Sabrina.

Politics is an interesting game full of shrewd egocentric people. And Jethmalani is one of them.

Vikas
Nov 6th, 2006 at 1:26 am | #

Coming to Jethmalani’s choice of defense I agree with Patrix, there is no “logical” reason for anyone to claim he shouldn’t defend Manu Sharma. However, I must disagree with “If we believe in justice and Manu is guilty, then no lawyer can save his ass.” Patrix, wake up to the reality. Just because “we” believe something, won’t change anything in the court of law. Jethmalani is not just a sharp lawyer, he is a bully and has a politicians’ mind. He has already “used” the media to scare the judges! CJI has already warned the media.

The case has just gone from bad to worse.

Utsa
Nov 6th, 2006 at 4:13 am | #

I would like to point out that I feel having such a renowned and a highly experienced lawyer such as Ram Jethmalani fighting your case in the Court will definitely make a big difference to the final verdict of the ongoing Jessica Lal Case. So, I would agree with Sakshi in that, if we are going to have lawyers with the likes of Jethmalani fighting for a ‘wrong’ cause then it does have a huge impact on people who actually want to finally see justice brought to the deceased Jessica Lal’s family. There should finally be light at the end of the long tunnel..is what I strongly feel.

Cheers.

Ashish
Nov 6th, 2006 at 7:55 am | #

We all believe that Manu Sharma is guilty, and I am sure that he and his dad have done all they can to subvert evidence. What they have managed to do is bad for the justice system, and portrays what is broken and needs to be fixed (witness protection, perjury laws, etc). One thing that is not broken is the ability to get a lawyer of your choice including as high profile a lawyer as available. For whatever Mr. Jethmalani’s immense abilities, what he says in the courtroom in the protection of his client is allowed to him. If we don’t like that, we fall easily into the trap that a person is suspected of heinous crimes and does not deserve a lawyer. Mr. Jethmalani also defended the Indira Gandhi suspects, and yet became a minister after that.
If the prosecuting agencies are lax and allow the accused to slip away in the trial, then there is outrage as we are seeing in the current cases. One can only hope that the courts take a view of the case based on its merits and not based on public / political pressure and are not pressurised by whoever lawyer is there.

Saakshi O. Juneja
Nov 6th, 2006 at 2:43 pm | #

Oh! Come on, to think that Jethmalani’s participation won’t have any (negative) effect on the case would be being totally naive. Yes, agree he can run the court for whosoever he wishes but don’t you think that a man of his position and status does hold some-sort off a responsibility towards the Indian public.

It’s just the case with Movie Stars who many perceive as role models. When they do anything wrong we all gladly jump on them accusing them of being irresponsible role models for younger generation and the rest. So what sort of a role model is Jethmalani for future generation of lawyers and other members of the justice system? And let’s not get started on the work-ethics issue here.

We are so use-to blaming the media for everything, even when they have actually helped in reviving lost battles.

We are talking about justice here and NOT democracy. The bottom line is that if the law had acted CORRECTLY in the first place then there would have been no question of the media law or people’s law.

High time we woke up because we are ONLY being screwed by opportunists suckers like Jethmalani.

Howard Roark
Nov 6th, 2006 at 6:10 pm | #

Gope Lalwani
Nov 7th, 2006 at 2:12 am | #

Ram Jethmalani has taken up the case of Manu Sharma, alleged killer of Jessica Lal and has lashed out at media for declaring Manu Sharma guilty
even before the Court’s judgement. In fact, this is another instance of the media-hype!

It is true that this murder-case is brought back to trial due to the public
opinion raised by the media —but at the same time we have to allow the
due process of law to go on.

Accused has the right to get the services of an advocate and it is for
the court to spell out the verdict after considering all submissions of both
sides and until that happens, we cannot be questioning the intermediate processes.

If Ram Jethmalani has decides to take up the case of Manu Sharma, we cannot fault him since that is his job & his sole prerogative!
Media is now unnecessarily trying to make an issue out of
a simple non-issue!

Media feel that he should not have taken up this case in view of the
vast public opinion that thinks that Manu Sharma is guilty.
However, the Court will not take into account the views of the people
in the matter. Court goes by the evidence which is produced before it
and the arguments of the lawyers.

Now, even if Manu Sharma is guilty, he is entitled to defend himself
through a lawyer and Mr.Ram Jethmalani is a lawyer who defends a
for that matter any other lawyer to choose his client carefully and go
by the public opinion. It is a lawyer’s right to choose his client.

It is true that rich and influential persons like Manu Sharma are in an advantageous position as they can hire best lawyers to defend themselves
and go Scot free even if guilty while a poor man who is not guilty may not be able to escape punishment because his case is not likely to be defended by
a competent lawyer.

So, what is to be done in such case? The simple answer is that we should have elected judges and Jury system on the pattern of USA so that they
could take the public opinion into account while deciding the case.

To cut the scrap short, the question of not allowing Ram Jethmalani to contest election does not arise as desired by author.
The Election laws does not have such options.
Indian politics are based on Vote Bank Politics,
and power of vote is unknown to people.
That’s why Indian Parliament has 40% parliamentarians having tainted and criminal record.

Sunita
Nov 7th, 2006 at 8:57 am | #

Ram Jethmalani- is undoubtedly a conniving, manipulative liar

Read this:
http://lalljessica.blogspot.com/

shadows
Nov 7th, 2006 at 12:05 pm | #

>> It’s just the case with Movie Stars who many perceive as role models.

Hey Sakshi :D gotcha…
Isnt salman worthy then, of the opinion that many have of him. :P

shadows
Nov 7th, 2006 at 12:11 pm | #

Ok, more seriously, Sakshi,

I agree, Jethmalani should have stayed away… but

You know what, Jethmalani is a smart lawyer, he knows manu is going to the gallows. He cannot save him. But why not make some money, if the sharmas are willing to give him a whole lot of moolah. :D he is just after the money.

BTW, salman still sucks bigtime. :P :D

I wonder why only jethmalani is under fire, when there are famous lawyers who regularly defend the underworld. Guess if jethmalani had picked up salmans case, he would have been called a great secular man…. of course, we are secular, arent we?

Eitika
Nov 7th, 2006 at 6:42 pm | #

Dear Patrix
I completely agree with Sakshi… She is not against Ram Jethmalani as an individual she is against him siding a criminal and as you say that manu Sharma is entitled toa fair trial I too strongly agree to it but hello what about the trial he faced earlier was that fair why did they ever then mishandle the evidences and gave money to the cops for mishandling the evidences… Surendra Sharma has stated that senior Delhi Police officials were aware about the replacement of the cartridges, which formed crucial evidence in the case… Then Shyam Munshi who stated that beacuse of his lack of knowledge of hindi he falsely accused Manu Sharma of killing Jessica Lal and then translating hindi into english ofr his screen test… Then Bina Ramani first agreeing n then diagreeing… For GAWD SAKE this is your country damn it dont let it go to the DOGS… Ram Jethmalani knows that he is a shrewd lawyer and can get away with hundred and one murders ask him to save one of the GOD BLESSED SOUL who who shoots Manu Sharma… Ask him to use his powers n shrewd brains in the right direction not save militants, murders, rapists and people connected with TADA… He sounds like one of those eccentric scientists to me who to get more powerfuland to get more fame has started to find ways of destruction and gets irritated (as he did in the NDTV interview… though I loved seeing him so perturbed n paranoid) when somebody tells him that you are wrong… Sakshi good work dont let your Morale down by comments from people like Patrix and Vikas

Saakshi O. Juneja
Nov 8th, 2006 at 6:54 am | #

Shadows - People can think whatever they want of Salman Khan. I have never promoted him as a ‘role model’ sorts for Indian masses and I shall never will.

Patrix
Nov 12th, 2006 at 8:31 pm | #

Sakshi good work dont let your Morale down by comments from people like Patrix and Vikas

Sakshi, your commenters crack me up.

Saakshi O. Juneja
Nov 13th, 2006 at 5:48 am | #

Patrix - :)

Eitika
Nov 15th, 2006 at 4:42 am | #

Well Patrix your postings show that you are a little cracked up ;-) (no offence here)… But Patrix try n see this case from Sabrina’s point of view she has lost her sister and with her close friends and relatives turning their back on her when she needs them the most how would it feel????? Probably I can say so coz I’ve been through a situation like that…

Satta Singh
Nov 15th, 2006 at 6:53 pm | #

Ram Shitmalini’s brain is disfunctional because he is freaking 83. He is completely lost in the case and does not have any clue what heck he is doing or for that matter what he saying. Earlier he said a cop shot JL, then he came up with the BS story that a tall sikh killed JL. What would be next coming from his behind. This rotton old fart needs a BRAIN TRANSPLAT in emergency, before he does something stupid.

satta singh
Dec 18th, 2006 at 2:52 pm | #

Manu has been convicted. Fuck You Ram Shitmalani

Leave a comment

Comment Guidelines:
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

eIndia reserves the right to take down irrelevant and improper comments without any notice. Please use your common sense when posting comments.

Email addresses will never be published.

About

Sakshi Juneja

We all have a right to express our views. In many instances; it will be against ours and in some; with us. To hear them out is 'decency' but to let them get to you is 'weakness'. More info »

I also blog at DesiDabba and DesiCritics

Campaigns

There are a lot of things that are wrong in this world. If we do not raise our voices and try to bring justice to these issues at hand, we do ourselves and our society an injustice. Here are some campaingns that are on-going at To Each It's Own

More campaigns

Recently on TEIO

Recent comments

Movie Reviews

More movie reviews

somerights20

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License

hit counter