Comments on: Truth Behind Princess Kimberley (Revisted) http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/2006/07/23/truth-behind-princess-kimberley-revisted/ Don't just sit there...do something ! Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:23:33 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc By: Saakshi O. Juneja http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/2006/07/23/truth-behind-princess-kimberley-revisted/comment-page-1/#comment-8640 Saakshi O. Juneja Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:36:07 +0000 http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/2006/07/23/truth-behind-princess-kimberley-revisted/#comment-8640 Beth - I have never been in favor of the blog ban or censorship of any form. Governments move was totally against our so-called <em>democratic rights</em> and thankfully the whole matter has been sorted out (atleast for now). What I meant was...that the reason they gave for taking such an extreme step atleast matched with (some) of the sites they black-listed. In short they did not Google some names and then use <strong>'inky pinky ponky'</strong> sort of means while preparing the list....as most of had thought. Hopefully we won't reach such an extreme stage as you have predicted. :) Beth – I have never been in favor of the blog ban or censorship of any form. Governments move was totally against our so-called democratic rights and thankfully the whole matter has been sorted out (atleast for now).

What I meant was…that the reason they gave for taking such an extreme step atleast matched with (some) of the sites they black-listed. In short they did not Google some names and then use ‘inky pinky ponky’ sort of means while preparing the list….as most of had thought.

Hopefully we won’t reach such an extreme stage as you have predicted. :)

]]> By: Beth http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/2006/07/23/truth-behind-princess-kimberley-revisted/comment-page-1/#comment-8620 Beth Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:58:09 +0000 http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/2006/07/23/truth-behind-princess-kimberley-revisted/#comment-8620 No, Njus, I assure you that is *not* the same Princess Kimberley that they intended to block. I am 110% sure that what I wrote is correct. I know what her website was like; if the Indian gov't was banning sites because they're afraid of hypersensitive Muslims getting their feelings hurt, the defunct princesskimberley.blogspot.com would be among the first they'd ban. Merri Musings, on the other hand, is just kinda funny. She's hardly offensive, unless the reader is a child abuser or molester. She just had *one* photoshopped picture up, with her URL on it (the old one) at another site--the site where Princess Kimberley, CFCS, the others, and I were also "found." And with all due respect to Sakshijuneja, I wholeheartedly disagree that the Indian govt's reasoning was sound. Is that how one should run a free country? By kowtowing to impetuous demands that are backed by threats of violence? That makes me think of a parent who gives in to a child's every demand so they don't scream and have a tantrum. The child will never learn how to live normally or in peace with anyone else. It seems that where ever there is a large Muslim population, there's a corresponding suppression of freedom of expression and religion. Why? Because people allow them to impose their beliefs and demands on everyone else. Today, the internet ban, tomorrow, a ban on something else. Maybe Bollywood movies. Maybe publicly professing faith in Hinduism or Christianity or Buddhism or Judaism or whatever. Maybe requirements for women to "cover up" so as not to insult or inflame mens' so-called "uncontrollable" urges. It isn't much of a stretch, you know. And obviously, the terrorists can see the Mumbai bombings worked in accomplishing at least one of their goals. What will they do next to accomplish the next step on the road to the Caliphate? No, Njus, I assure you that is *not* the same Princess Kimberley that they intended to block. I am 110% sure that what I wrote is correct. I know what her website was like; if the Indian gov’t was banning sites because they’re afraid of hypersensitive Muslims getting their feelings hurt, the defunct princesskimberley.blogspot.com would be among the first they’d ban.
Merri Musings, on the other hand, is just kinda funny. She’s hardly offensive, unless the reader is a child abuser or molester. She just had *one* photoshopped picture up, with her URL on it (the old one) at another site–the site where Princess Kimberley, CFCS, the others, and I were also “found.”
And with all due respect to Sakshijuneja, I wholeheartedly disagree that the Indian govt’s reasoning was sound. Is that how one should run a free country? By kowtowing to impetuous demands that are backed by threats of violence? That makes me think of a parent who gives in to a child’s every demand so they don’t scream and have a tantrum. The child will never learn how to live normally or in peace with anyone else.
It seems that where ever there is a large Muslim population, there’s a corresponding suppression of freedom of expression and religion. Why? Because people allow them to impose their beliefs and demands on everyone else.
Today, the internet ban, tomorrow, a ban on something else. Maybe Bollywood movies. Maybe publicly professing faith in Hinduism or Christianity or Buddhism or Judaism or whatever. Maybe requirements for women to “cover up” so as not to insult or inflame mens’ so-called “uncontrollable” urges. It isn’t much of a stretch, you know. And obviously, the terrorists can see the Mumbai bombings worked in accomplishing at least one of their goals. What will they do next to accomplish the next step on the road to the Caliphate?

]]> By: Njus http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/2006/07/23/truth-behind-princess-kimberley-revisted/comment-page-1/#comment-8618 Njus Sun, 23 Jul 2006 06:31:15 +0000 http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/2006/07/23/truth-behind-princess-kimberley-revisted/#comment-8618 99% sure this is the truely blocked kimberley site: http://princesskimberley.logspot.com 99% sure this is the truely blocked kimberley site:
http://princesskimberley.logspot.com

]]>