Post

Male hypocrisy

Well reading thru piles of daily morning newspapers, I came across a rather interesting article written by ‘Vipul Kulshreshtha’, a regular reader of ‘Mumbai Mirror’.

The article, is basically a confession of ‘male hypocrisy’ that exists in the Indian society. He has given certain situational examples of today’s so-called ‘modern men’ who gladly stand by and help their women, in daily chores but are hesitant to confess them to their male friends. They prefer to keep their actual feelings locked up behind their bedroom doors, to escape being labeled as “Joru ka Gulam”.

Here is the entire write-up….

Confessions of an honest male

I know, I may be banished, or in the worst-case scenario, crucified by fellow males for writing this. But, even if it is a dirty job to expose male hypocrisy, someone’s got to do it. So here goes…

It is a misconception that only women love to gossip. Men do it too, as much as women, but only among themselves. They are up-to-date on the office romances, neighbour’s dalliances, differences between a friend and his wife and other juice. In the presence of women, however, the conversation is confined to money matters, investments, technology, sports, politics, with a little bit of Hollywood and Bollywood thrown in. All done to sound better read and better informed.

Many modern men help their wives in cooking, changing children’s diapers, and others run errands. But when this fact is mentioned in front of someone, even admiringly, they get a start. Because such a revelation could make them a prime candidate for the ‘Joru ka Gulam’ tag.

Most men lavish praise on their wives in private, but they dare not do it in the presence of another man. The rule is to keep taking digs at your wife and crack jokes about her follies and inadequacies.

Most women want their men to relinquish all vices, so, many a time they are after their man to refuse the invitation to that all male booze session which is becoming a little too frequent for comfort. But can a man refuse going to such a session citing his wife’s ire? No way! He will suddenly fall ill, or have unexpected guests.

No man worth his salt would ever admit in public that his wife drives the car better than him, is more computer-savvy, can fix that fuse, or haggle with and supervise the carpenters, plumber, or masons better than he can, is better at handling the accounts than him, or is more organised than he ever would be.

Most men lie while talking about their sexual conquests. They desperately want to project an image of a Casanova. Whereas, the truth is that, most of the times they would have spent the night with their date talking about the works of William Shakespeare or any other topic under the sun. I could tell you more but my friends just called to invite me for the all-night beer-session. I’ll tell them I can’t come. My mother-in-law just popped in!

Above article, though being humorous brings forward a far more serious problem that exists in our Indian society or for that matter all over world. The problem being that even in our modern-educated society, male chauvinism still exists, however much we may try to camouflage it. Men are still egotists at heart. Some still feel hesitant to acknowledge the fact that women can indeed rub shoulders with them and excel in any field as much as they do, so the scope of them excepting these very facts among their own kind seems like a distant dream.

Surely there are many women, who don’t complain or winge over this issue. And I can understand this to a certain degree, I mean as long as the husband is taking upon an equal share of responsibilities and is acknowledging his wife’s (justified) needs THEN it doesn’t matter if he hides these ‘inside-details’ from his male buddies.

But then come to think of it, if men do start confessing and discussing the ‘actual truth’ among each other, definitely the result could only be positive step towards a better society. Gender equality that exists inside their house, would then be able to inhale fresh air in the open. And probably only then pathetic terms such as “Joru ka Gulam”, “Napunsak” and “Paltu Pati” cease to exist.

(disclaimer : the above references are made ONLY towards certain [and hopefully minimum] male section of the India society and is NOT targeted towards the entire gender.)

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

Trackback Address »

[...] Sakshi comments on the supposedly hypocritical nature of men. He [the author] has given certain situational examples of today’s so-called ‘modern men’ who gladly stand by and help their women, in daily chores but are hesitant to confess them to their male friends. They prefer to keep their actual feelings locked up behind their bedroom doors, to escape being labeled as “Joru ka Gulam”. [...]

Pingback by DesiPundit » Male Hypocrisy? — October 25, 2005 at 6:45 pm | #

Comments

12 comments | Add your comment »

Kapil
Oct 21st, 2005 at 1:04 pm | #

Let me admit, my wife-to-be is a much better negotiator when it comes to money and she gets us a killer deal many a times.

raven
Oct 21st, 2005 at 3:00 pm | #

I’m not Indian but desi enough to have the same genes/memes. And — following Kapil — let me admit that my wife does everything better than me. Except maybe table tennis.

sakshi
Oct 22nd, 2005 at 6:15 am | #

Hi ! Kapil and Raven, glad to hear your confessions… :) , Just hope that you guys are not attacked by the ‘SIFs’, they will surely not be happy reading this.

Sumanth
Oct 23rd, 2005 at 10:01 am | #

1) Men are conditioned by Patriarchy in India not to express themselves.

2) We in Save Indian Family train men to express themselves freely (even including positive and negatives of their sex lives).

3) Society trains young boys to protect and provide for the family. That makes them stiff.

4) Today, every young man(especially techies) know cooking, cleaning as they spend many years abroad before marriage. For them, these confessions are nothing new.

5) You, being a woman can never really understand what a man’s real motives are. For example, a man may not express much about his wife as he may be more concerned about privacy.

6) You have to notice that many urban men are encouraged by women like you and media to hate themselves.

So far as male ego is concerned, is an undividual male responsible for that ? Is there any organisation which can teach him to drop that ego without burdening him with guilt and self-hatred ?

7) Feminists are just interested in male bashing and they will give trophies to men who will comeout with self-hatred and make confessions. But, are there any tools to drop that ego without that hatred ?

8) Unless, women stop using men as protectors and providers, nothing is going to change. Women need to change themselves first and start protecting-providing for themselves. From an age of 10, young boys are made to feel like unpaid bodyguards by their mothers, aunts, elder sisters. When will they stop doing that ? Patriarchy make men to supress emotions(stop crying) from age of 5. Just imagine, how terrible that life must have been.

Sumanth
Oct 23rd, 2005 at 10:08 am | #

Please do not equate someone’s helplessness (for the conditioning that he has got) as Male Chauvinism.

A male child is trained to be competitive, to take risks, to protect and provide at the expense of his own well being. As a result, a male is quite insecure deep inside. But, if it is equated with male chauvinism, then we remain where we are.

Stereotyping every study, article, statistic towards male bashing can be equally termed as “Female Chauvinism”. Even today, I see female’s marry up(except tendulkar’s wife). So, that implies they want a stronger male (in education, in money, in everything including ego).

These contradictory requirements makes life difficult for men. Today, urban women want their men to change just the way they change the channel in a TV.

bharati
Oct 24th, 2005 at 5:47 am | #

Naw this male bashing is far more trivial matter and probably true in many respect

we SIF-ians face the Male hypocracy in equal matters .

Our issue is that feminist hypocracy is institutionalised in law. I think there are some male hypocracise instituaionalised in law but t diesn’t help the equality oriented males

I suspect Sakshi is secretly an SIFian atleast in thinking becuase she came out against alimony as an anachronistic for the 21st century society and I suspect she is against the rigid gender roles that women should cook and clean . ( This rigid gender role we are also against just as we are against institutionalising the provider role for the male )

The SIF-ian churn your are seeing not just to do with Dowry or DV but a negation of lot that was belived to be home truth under patriarchy .Yes it is primarily male speaking on gender issues which why it comes in different form but it directed towards gender-equality and also selfish in the sense they are saying we want what we want , want to live our lifes for ourselves and want to be treated equally under the law for eg:- a women is asked in AD to think of deserving herslef treat for herslef where as a man is asked to be responsible and give some money to his family on his death . The first thing the Fathers in law ask him is to take an LIC policy on behalf of his wife even if she is working . Is the wife so helpless that she cannot take care of herslef in
event of his death ?

I am glad it is noted that we believe the problem of misuse of gender laws is happening becuase of the overall atmosphere where in it is okay to bash a male. It has beome norm on advertisement almost like that male should be treated as confused about their roles and idots while a women has to be always shown as intelligents smart etc. The reality is there are men and women of all types

One should not forget the Sneering tone about males in India today where in they did some sex survey . This is nothing but hypocracy

Many SIF-ians feel uncomfertable to charge their wives as cruel becuase their wives did not cook for them ( it is true their wives dint cook but it was their behest ! ) . The real cruelity comes becuase their wives want to treat every quarrel relating to dress sense , parental interefernce as Violence. To negate the pain of conveting a quarrel as Violence where as to make it seem like not cooking is a major cuelity is a hypocracy

It is legal systems hypocracy ( primarily male ) which belives that a wife who does not cook is cruel compard to a wife who treats a quarrel regarding dress sense or sharing of expenses as Verbal and mental abuse

Furthur Male hypocracy to noted is that a man will ogle at a stylishly dressed women but if someone ogling at his relative he will react
Churlishly .

Furthur Male hypocracy is noted that False dowry cases are not treated seriously in legal system ( again primarily male with feminist indoctrination ) .

Again I would advise males against trusting Women with their hard earned money not becuase women are not better at finance or because women are not trustworthy in keeping his interests are heart but becuase if she financially cheats him there is not a thimble of protection available in law.So even if the women is better at finances still do not ever maintain joint accounts , joint lockers etc it can lead to lot of legal hassles.

sakshi
Oct 24th, 2005 at 8:18 am | #

Sumanth & Bharati – Here you guys again, thank god!! I was sort-off missing you SIF folks. :)

Vinod Khare
Oct 25th, 2005 at 7:31 pm | #

Hi,
There are many things that I dislike about women. I sincerely wish that they’d stop that. But they cannot. Because then they’d not be women. Men are men and women are women. They can be equal only in terms of opportunity and treatment that they get from others. Expecting them to be equal in behaviour, is in my opinion, trying to force artificial identities on either communities.

Ashutosh
Oct 25th, 2005 at 9:47 pm | #

The problem is that even if some men do admit that their wives are better than them in some respects, how do you know whether it is a sincere admission, or simply a display of ‘inverted vanity’ that says “Look, how modest I am (or rather, want to sound). I am so gracious that I am admitting my pitfalls in the face of my wife’s considerably more adept skills”

Mridula
Oct 26th, 2005 at 5:48 am | #

Hmm, form the discussion going on here one can see that the issue irkes so many people in different ways, not willing to give in an inch! Now in such a situation I guess no meaningful discussion can take place.

sakshi
Oct 26th, 2005 at 6:02 am | #

Vinod – I somehow don’t agree with your views on this subject. “Men are men and women are women”, it is ‘such’ thinking that does not contribute in the betterment of the society. Doesn’t this come under the “treatment” section ?? Why is it so hard to except the “truth”??

Ashutosh – Well this depends on individuals…and I believe “true intentions”, do come out in the open one day or the other.

Mridula – I completely agree with you, such topics often come up with not-so meaningful thoughts/views. However, that should’nt stop the other person from saying what they think “might” be meaningful. Thanks for dropping by… :)

Leave a comment

Comment Guidelines:
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

eIndia reserves the right to take down irrelevant and improper comments without any notice. Please use your common sense when posting comments.

Email addresses will never be published.

← Previous post
Independant Women – Part II
Next post →
Height Of Insanity

About

Sakshi Juneja

We all have a right to express our views. In many instances; it will be against ours and in some; with us. To hear them out is 'decency' but to let them get to you is 'weakness'. More info »

I also blog at DesiDabba and DesiCritics

Campaigns

There are a lot of things that are wrong in this world. If we do not raise our voices and try to bring justice to these issues at hand, we do ourselves and our society an injustice. Here are some campaingns that are on-going at To Each It's Own

More campaigns

Recently on TEIO

Recent comments

Movie Reviews

More movie reviews

From DesiDabba

  • No items

Visit DesiDabba

somerights20

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License

hit counter