Post

Evil within the four walls

Domestic violence is one of the gravest and the most pervasive of human right violations in India. Most victims of domestic violence are women. They come from all social and economic backgrounds. Domestic Violence happens within the family – it is a way of controlling another person. Victims of domestic violence suffer physical injury, live in fear in and of their homes, and have no power over their lives.Yet, there is very little by way of response from the community or the state received over the years. For this crime is looked upon as a personal matter, not withstanding the fact that for large number of women this personal matter translates into a life along “adjustment” with torture, both mental and physical. For many, this adjustments end only with the loss of their lives.

Marriage vows under any culture involve promises to love, cherish and protect. And yet even as you read this, there are thousands of women who are being battered and beaten by their husbands. Here is another incident of domestic violence, which probably will land up being one of the thousands of physical and mental abuse of women stories occouring practically every hour in our so called “matrabhoomi”. One of our family friend’s daughter had filed a domestic violence case against her husband about a year ago. Hers was a love marriage against her family’s will, but her family finally gave in since she is their only daughter. All seemed to be going well, until her husband started coxing her to ask money from her family so that he could pay for his Australian Resident Visa procedure and formalities. The whole procedure was costing him around Rs. 35 Lakhs, as per his visa consultant. Since he and his family could not afford this huge amount, he started pressureing his wife to get it from her family.

At first she resisted, but later gave in her husband’s wishes since he promised to re-pay her parents as soon as starts earning in dollars. Her family gave them the money without any hitch. They sold their ancestral land and took some loan from their relatives. This somehow did not satisfy her husband greedy needs. It was just the beginning, after that he repeatedly asked for more money (all for the visa and other procedures for migrating). Whenever she would resist or deny his demands, he would abuse her and her family verbally and at times even physically torment her. His family, never questioned their son’s actions and at times even joined him in his evil plots. Finally, one day she left her husband’s home and went back to her family.

Her father met his son-inlaw many times and tried his best to resolve the situation but he only got more abuse and insults in return. So finally the girl filed for divorce and domestic violence against her husband and in-laws. But what I heard yesterday completely shocked me. The girl and her family apprantly have withdrawn the case and she has returned back to her husband. Now this action was not prompted by her husband realisation of his mistakes, BUT because her family yet again gave in his monetary demand. They paid him by selling their 4 bedroom flat and breaking their saving bonds. She and family decided to go ahead with this cause they could not bear the society pressure and thought that the whole courtroom process would further tarnish their family image among their people.

This step taken by the girl has some what shaken my faith in so called “women-power”. Till now I thought that such cases mostly happened among the un-educated class, since they are un-aware of the provisions made by women NGOs, activists and the government, but I was so very wrong. What is the use of “women-education”, if we are still going to land up with such results. What sort of example are these educated women setting for the younger generation and most importantly for the women in similar situation. Wife beating is deeply entrenched even in educated society. It is accepted as a man’s right and a woman’s due. There are certain communities in which it is an acceptable fact of existence. Neighbours, relatives, even other family members don’t so much as raise an eyebrow, let alone frown upon it.

In general, society holds the view that if a man is battering his wife, she must have done something to provoke his ire. Such provocation could include anything from laxity in doing the housework, failing to respect the husband or questioning his authority. All of these are transgressions for which she must be strictly disciplined. This is in consonance with the belief that the man is the head of the family and that it is his right and privilege to beat his wife to establish his authority over her. Beating one’s wife is looked upon as a method of ensuring social control. There is also a certain belief that a woman must be beaten up from time to time just to keep her in line.

Some Information on Domestic Voilence Laws in India -

It is becoming increasingly clear that domestic violence is rampant in the country. Surveys conducted in the last few years underline that women, cutting across economic, social, educational, religious or geographic lines, face violence at home. A study carried out by the International Centre for Research on Women in 2004 found that 40 per cent of Indian women faced some form of domestic violence. Even more shocking is this, The National Family Health Survey of 2002-03 found that 56 per cent of women thought that the beatings were justified.

Domestic violence was first recognised as a criminal offence in 1983 with the introduction of Section 498 A into the Indian Penal Code. Under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, beating, mental or physical torture or general cruelty to a wife by her husband and his relatives is a non-bailable offence. However this law only had a limited ambit, since it dealt only with cruelty by the husband and his family towards a married woman.

But there has been a break-thru recently. A landmark Bill to protect women from all forms of domestic violence and check harrassment and exploitation at the hands of family members or relatives was unanimously passed by the Lok Sabha in August, this year.

Domestic Voilence Bill 2005, is the result of a decade-long campaign by women’s groups, social and legal bodies and NGOs for a civil law against domestic violence. The new Bill not only recognises an old position — that violence, actual or threatened, is not just physical maltreatment, BUT can be sexual, verbal or psychological abuse as well. It covers women in marriages and live-in relationships, and those living in a shared household related by “consanguinity or adoption”. The new Bill also gives a victim the right to residence and access to a protection officer, who is answerable to the courts.

Campaigners against domestic violence see the Bill as a major moveforward. All these years, the law ignored the issue of domestic violence, which meant that victims had three options to follow. They could go in for a divorce, file criminal proceedings, or put up with violence. Most chose the last option. Whereas the new Bill has a lot to offer women — it provides for compensation, promises relief and assures protection. This bill also allows any person to give information in good faith about domestic violence without any civil or criminal liability. This will help in situations where the aggrieved woman is unable to reach for help. The information is to be given to a police officer, protection officer, a notified service provider (NGO) or magistrate. They, in turn are expected to brief the aggrieved woman of her right to seek shelter, home, legal aid, medical services, or file a complaint under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Still Long Struggle Ahead -

Even though the new bill appears as the bright sun of light for many unfortunate women in our country, there is still a long road ahead in respect to proper implemenation of the law. The biggest challenge being to unwrap the silence that covers domestic violence. Sadly, even today some women themselves don’t question their husband’s violence against them. In India, especially, most systems are still so woefully patriarchal, that there is no room for an egalitarian concept like respect for a woman. It is important to make them understand that once violence begins, it will continue to escalate if they don’t protest against it or if they bears it meekly. Hoping that violent behaviour ends and that the husband sees the error of his ways is not the solution.

The family is the basic unit of society. And yet nowhere the dignity, safety and security of a woman more in danger than within the four walls of her home. It is no use fighting for safe streets if women feel threatened in the place where they ought to feel the safest. A society that cannot provide its women enough security to live fearlessly within their own homes can only portend a dangerous world.

(Disclaimer – the above info has been gathered from various sources. Some of the sources are listed below-)

1.Domestic Violence Issue - The Delhi Commission for Women

2.Voilence against women – Raghvendra Singh Raghuvanshi

3.Indian Cabinet approves domestic violence bill – Info India

Here is an interesting article that talks in details about the implemenation problem faced by the Domestic Voilence Bill 2005. 

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

Trackback Address »

wanting to scream out loud, hoping that so-called “TV gurus” would hear our plead one day. This entry was posted on Friday, October 28th, 2005 at 9:02 am and is filed under Lists, Humor, India. You can follow any responses to this entry through theRSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. 46 Responses to “The old “idiot” box…” sowmya Says: October 28th, 2005 at 12:08 pm First time here. Your post took me through a nostalgic journey down DD lane. Indeed the

Pingback by My First Publishings.... — January 9, 2006 at 7:42 am | #

great blog…

Trackback by great blog — January 2, 2007 at 7:19 am | #

[...] and then his own ‘India in Regress’ The topic being women, and heres Sakshi with a hard hitting post on domestic violence and Vijay with his thoughts on women and Indian mythologySakshi also has a post on Independent [...]

Pingback by interim thoughts...: October 2005 — February 19, 2007 at 3:04 pm | #

[...] To Each Its Own » Archives » Evil within the four walls http://sakshijuneja.com/blog/?p=169 [...]

Pingback by nurseadvocate.org — March 29, 2007 at 3:53 am | #

Comments

14 comments | Add your comment »

SJ
Oct 13th, 2005 at 8:26 pm | #

What determines whether a woman will givein to abuse like this or not is not her social status, but her ability to support herself financially. Many women for whom education contributes only to their status or social standing will find themselves unable to resist when faced with unjust demands. Thats why you have bais who earn their own living throw out abusive husbands while girls with (outdated) MBAs/MSc/MA continue to live in abusive households.

On a sidenote, the right to residence in the new bill appears shortsighted and unjust to men. According to this, a wife may be sleeping with someone other than her husband, and yet demand accomodation in a house – the rent for which is being paid by the husband !!

sakshi
Oct 14th, 2005 at 5:13 am | #

SJ – Firstly thanks for dropping by. I agree, that monetary backing is avery important issue for such women BUT in the incident i mentioned, it was more inclined towards “what the society would think” attitude that lead to the girl changing her mind. The girl is well-educated and is working in a MNC and earning good income, plus she would have received ALIMONY after the divorce., so I am sure the money aspect would’nt have been a big issue.

What hurts me the most about this whole thing is that, If women in similar situation keep giving up their battle without a fight, then how will we ever achieve the goal of GENDER EQUALITY in this country. It’s like we take two steps forward…and then one big step backward. I know, it’s easy said then done….but a FIGHT is better any day rather then continuing living a miserable and fearful life.

As for the right to residence in the new bill, also is good for women since it will make it harder for inlaws to throw out daughter-inlaws under false allegations and she can still have her right of accomodation in the house that she is rightful memeber also. BUT sadly in our country, the laws are not full proof and there are more lawyers looking for loop holes in the system to save their money-makin client rather then doing what is rightful and just.

All in all….i still think that the new Domestic Law Bill is definately a step forward in the correct direction.

bharati
Oct 14th, 2005 at 7:52 pm | #

Sadly the domestic violence bill ignores the reality that around 50-60 % of men ace verbal and , mental , emotional abuse by Women .
Regarding right to residence maybe it might be a better optiotn for ht women to come and buy the house .Sadly In the survey of the 300 educated women only 2% of the women made any contribution towards buildng a house and this is those MBAs and Engineer women.
Anotehr reality fro Western Societies ia that women initiate 2/3rd of the violence .
Regarding 498a a serious analysis done by Karnatka Judicary showed that at the minumum 45% o the Dowry& 498a Cases were thoroughly unjustified .
The seriousness of the trauma faced by men after marriage can be gauged by the fact that ther eis is jump of 50% of sucide by men after marriage which is 3 times the mysterious deaths of women
Teh choices available to women are many and if she wants a residence then wahe can earn it througher sweat and blood. She need not depend ont eh sweat of some other person.
The men are born and continuously want to to please the women of there life it is sad that they are being put to such trauma and if they complaint now the goverment will revictimise them

sakshi
Oct 15th, 2005 at 6:47 am | #

Bharati- Firstly thanks for leaving a comment and stopping by my blog.

Now in regards to your survey, I don’t think the bill is ignoring 50-60% of men, the problem here is the SOME women are mis-using the law and because of that SOME men suffer. BUT then there are MEN too who have and are finding loop holes in the justice system for their advantage.

Regarding the Right of Residence, I do not agree with you. Yes, the women can buy a seperate house but that can happen only if the husband is willing to pay partly for it. A women’s contribution cannot be judged on the basis of the monetary income she gets to the house. She does in-deed put her sweat and blood in the house…in MANY other ways. I think this is simply unfair- and biased.

As for the seriousness of trauma, well over the years there have been thousands of women who have been killed or have killed themselves after marriage..be it for dowry problems, infedality by husband, leech minded inlaws, rape, etc. You seem to have forgotten this aspect.

The women is not depending on someone else’s sweat, she is just asking for what is rightfully hers.

In-short, there are men and women who have taken our legal system for a ride. To blame the entire women clan for it is not RIGHT.

Wasif
Nov 12th, 2005 at 7:50 am | #

No one is blaming the entire women community of nefarious intents, its only directed towards evil women. The point we are trying to draw is that equal number of men, if not more, are victims of domestic violence as there are women. No women organisation, government or concerned feminists are willing to admit it. The laws are being framed to address the plight of women and not men. The laws are passed assuming and presuming so many things, that defies the basic framework of just society.
There is a precedence of wide spread misuse of utterly biased laws, which unfortunately, they don’t want to admit, for reasons best known to them. Saying that laws are equally being misused by men and women, tell me one law that is being misused by men against women and why isn’t there any mention by women organisation for any such law.

Its very sad and disheartening to observe that the very men who are helping women attain equality in society, are being branded criminals.

If women want to attain equality, they have to understand that playing blame game wouldn’t help the cause. At some point of time, they have toadmit the facts and realities, else, feminism would be out of fashion, as has happened in western society.

bhumi
Dec 5th, 2005 at 10:38 am | #

dear Sakshi,
i read ur article and felt as if i am reading my own story.
when i went bak to my husband’s house after the so called compromise they were good to me for sometime but later on again he started beating and abusing me.
although i am earning myself ,till date i have no financial fredom nor do i have a right to contact my parents in my husband’s absence.
i really don’t know why i am unable to gather courage and speak up against this man, may be i am worried abt what my parents will go thru if i speak up.
i feel the girl that u mentioned abt also went thru similar pressure and sakshi i must tell u that in such a situation it is very difficult to take some decision.
well all i can say is that i am still trying to gather courage and someday i surely will.

amsoconfused
Mar 7th, 2006 at 6:39 am | #

dear all, thanks for writing in on this coz this issue is very close to my heart. MEN don’t even have a right to comment on this issue coz they will never understand. Its fine to say that some women might misuse the law but much more often than not its women only who bear the brunt of domestic violence. and yes if you feel i’m a feminist then so be it but a LAW NEEDS to be enacted wherein a man is tied to a pole and stoned to death if he so much as lifts his hand to beat a woman

Bhumi, I totally empathise with you. A very evry close friend of mine is going through the same thing. but in her case i’m the only person who knows what she’s actually going thru. she can’t even share it with her parents for the same reasons- they’ll not be able to take it and will mostly not support her also. my heart breaks everytime she’s abused- meantally or physically but i get very irritated also coz she’s not standing up against it.

i think what is of prime importance is financial independence for women whih is in the woman’s own hands. never ever should we be financially dependent on anyone- it makes taking decisions in life easier. secondly i feel we indians bother too much about society and what ppl say. I say F_ _ K people. they don’t matter coz they don’t really care about you……….

madhu
Mar 17th, 2006 at 8:28 pm | #

My sister is going through the same kind of torture. Hers is a love marriage and the guy and his father keep on asking for money. today he even broke her magalsutra and gave it to her saying that my parents had bought that for her. i feel there is no future to this repaltionship.
but i know that because of the pressure of the society they will go to live together. i dont wanna tell anything becuase i feel any decision should be taken by them and should not be influenced by anyone

geetha sree
Mar 2nd, 2007 at 8:09 am | #

this law was not enough to secure the woman’s life. now a days the voilence in the Indian society is very high , it’s just intorallarable.
the Indian women is unable to lead her life in a satisfactory manner.
eaven female children also face the voilence by the family members. they face education problems,marriege problems etc. they don’t filfil their ambitions, desires.
A married woman sacrifice her total life tothe entier family. but the male members of the family can’t identify her services,and ignor her with an arragent manner.it is very painfull toher physically, mentally.
the law must reforms and gave compleatly protection to the harassed one.

sarkar
Jun 4th, 2007 at 11:06 am | #

To female commentators, please donot run your sob stories to push for invalid cause. Bring on your husbands and let them have a say alongside and truth can only be revealed then. A statistical study shows that women initiate violence in more than 50% of cases and they are 9 times more likely to report it than men. My wife beat me and then filed a case that i beat her mercilessly even when i did not even touch her. I can easily assume how gravely you must have tormented your husbands for him to have acted in self defense and punished you for your mis-deeds(and that is if you are speaking lie). His retaliation was because of suppression he faces from society. If he goes out to society, it ridicules him that he can not handle his wife. He sees no laws to protect him from your onslaughts and bickering. When he is pushed to wall, he has no choice but to act in self defense which you bunch portray as your sob-stories.

Sakshi , you are incorrect in data reporting on more than one occasions….
The study(which happened in 1998-99 and not in 2003 as you stated) which reported 56% women agree that it is ok for man to act in defense if women committed such and such acts also said that only 11% women(and that too most are from lower strata of society) per year are subjected to any DV. The report does not take into account the fact that women initiate violence in more than half of cases and hence men who act in self defense are also categorized as perpetrators.

Leave a comment

Comment Guidelines:
You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

eIndia reserves the right to take down irrelevant and improper comments without any notice. Please use your common sense when posting comments.

Email addresses will never be published.

About

Sakshi Juneja

We all have a right to express our views. In many instances; it will be against ours and in some; with us. To hear them out is 'decency' but to let them get to you is 'weakness'. More info »

I also blog at DesiDabba and DesiCritics

Campaigns

There are a lot of things that are wrong in this world. If we do not raise our voices and try to bring justice to these issues at hand, we do ourselves and our society an injustice. Here are some campaingns that are on-going at To Each It's Own

More campaigns

Recently on TEIO

Recent comments

Movie Reviews

More movie reviews

somerights20

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License

hit counter